The Audacity of Audacity by E.J.Dione Jr. The Washington Post
On the Road to Change: The Psychology of Progress by Roy Eidelson Cognitive Policy Works
I was going to make my usual preemptive comments after a glance at these, or headline this "for my coffee table" but read them instead. I have enough on my coffee table, or kitchen table, not to mention night stand. There is no relative weight to these tables but there is enough of an endorsement from the dark side.
(Both "enough" harken back to who is driving the GOP and who is good [see the bill] frum ofor what.)
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Coffee. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Coffee. Sort by date Show all posts
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Wednesday, December 07, 2011
A Penchant for Leaning
Meaning squared*, or cubed**.
* words with frenemies
(not original in tent (off the cliff and ledership/following/tides)
Not to mention a day that will live in infamy. A day of REnown.
[What is the antonym of penchant? The slippery slope of indifference.]
** (x,y,z)
}*{ (C or Sea "words") not exactly Baldwin
Note: sequence of asterisks and references }within{ asterisks
Post comment: Speaking of Triggers(Reich/Boehner & The Place for Politics) Ad Hominem is kind, Lyin'ization is the reality.
[Speaking of Daddy(papa]
[Care2-Raw Story-Move to Amend/ 12-6 Thom Hartmann]
[Lewis Black on Trump.
12-8-11
[Don't Think of an Elephant/DawnKeyOT As for the conventions of the GOP 2012: it may go down the un-Gingrich, un-Romney, un-Koch Brothers or Rove. "Make or break moment for the middle-class." President Obama]
[Jansing and Wassermann-Schultz, Wagner and Steele***(Counter attack, count down, Trump panel.)]
[Capitol Punishment?, Founding Resources ]
*** Is Steele on the edge of the pit e full? Speaking of ledership and X-mass lists & F=ma.
[Sunrise, sunset? Ctrl F tides... and gyro scopes? Note the irony that Germany and France are involved in saving Italy and Greece. Note the balance of the un-bubble-up of the GOP. And the "Reich", "Place" are not the Right Link, but here is the Coffee Party. Which Teddy?]
Notes on anachronism, labelism, seg way, Com Pro Mises[!] (dot, dot, dot...Dylan ? )
[Churned Media]
[Rough Reader/Swift Rider)<-Links Retro-actively inserted. But here is the deal. Also inserting sunrise, sunset, or so not found yet.]
[Speaking of apPEASmeant, see Ed Schultz and Senator B.S.(It seems that both Romney and Perry really want to, but something Trumps them debating on Newsmax.)]
[Last Word / First Word or not, at Rest.]
* words with frenemies
(not original in tent (off the cliff and ledership/following/tides)
Not to mention a day that will live in infamy. A day of REnown.
[What is the antonym of penchant? The slippery slope of indifference.]
** (x,y,z)
}*{ (C or Sea "words") not exactly Baldwin
Note: sequence of asterisks and references }within{ asterisks
Post comment: Speaking of Triggers(Reich/Boehner & The Place for Politics) Ad Hominem is kind, Lyin'ization is the reality.
[Speaking of Daddy(papa]
[Care2-Raw Story-Move to Amend/ 12-6 Thom Hartmann]
[Lewis Black on Trump.
12-8-11
[Don't Think of an Elephant/DawnKeyOT As for the conventions of the GOP 2012: it may go down the un-Gingrich, un-Romney, un-Koch Brothers or Rove. "Make or break moment for the middle-class." President Obama]
[Jansing and Wassermann-Schultz, Wagner and Steele***(Counter attack, count down, Trump panel.)]
[Capitol Punishment?, Founding Resources ]
*** Is Steele on the edge of the pit e full? Speaking of ledership and X-mass lists & F=ma.
[Sunrise, sunset? Ctrl F tides... and gyro scopes? Note the irony that Germany and France are involved in saving Italy and Greece. Note the balance of the un-bubble-up of the GOP. And the "Reich", "Place" are not the Right Link, but here is the Coffee Party. Which Teddy?]
Notes on anachronism, labelism, seg way, Com Pro Mises[!] (dot, dot, dot...Dylan ? )
[Churned Media]
[Rough Reader/Swift Rider)<-Links Retro-actively inserted. But here is the deal. Also inserting sunrise, sunset, or so not found yet.]
[Speaking of apPEASmeant, see Ed Schultz and Senator B.S.(It seems that both Romney and Perry really want to, but something Trumps them debating on Newsmax.)]
[Last Word / First Word or not, at Rest.]
Monday, October 06, 2008
Palin Not Albright
Now that is really the point.
In this area, Palin is right. The media did turn it into something. Palin played the media card, right on top of the gender card. Thanks to ThomHartmann.com and this getting me through Huffington Post, to Keating Economics.
[What Palin read! Coffee Cups!]
In this area, Palin is right. The media did turn it into something. Palin played the media card, right on top of the gender card. Thanks to ThomHartmann.com and this getting me through Huffington Post, to Keating Economics.
[What Palin read! Coffee Cups!]
Tuesday, September 04, 2012
Out Foxed?
Obtuseness Redux.
Why does Social Security Need 174,000 bullets?
Dems open convention playing defense of Obama.
Get the lede out?
Not to bury any ironies or unintended puns...
The first two links are referenced in the next two lines.
The third line and two links are in regard to the heading, and to the sources.
The "Obtuseness Redux" were from Comcast/AP.
But I first went local then tan gent or BaneOr BainOr...
the punchline has to do with they nature of Infowars(the site), a bit more journalistic and fair and balanced than FOX, not that they do not require very careful reads. The four links seem to represent a sort of unsorting and GPS un-crossroads dynamic. And for my part, the first aspect has to do with the irony of any whining about Social Security having an Inspector General division that hunts down fraud, in this age of second amendment fruit salad or T-parties. And for the sake of any intelligence briefs or geeks, "lede" is a journalistic term not a bullet point. The last two links are a good un-cross Rhodes* of the left. Not quite Tin-Foil Hats, not quite Coffee Party, but maybe close enough. (4 hard work?)
* not exactly
** ibid?
(See Labels, but I note here the original four:
DNC Convention, Infowars, Seattle PI, Social Security
(I know, [...] there is a local irony...)
[and global...]***
*** Re-verse asterisk of sorts. Emphasis on not read yet and irony. Heavy on the latter.
[For Rob Sake!]
[M-bed-ed? Actually...]
Why does Social Security Need 174,000 bullets?
Dems open convention playing defense of Obama.
Get the lede out?
Not to bury any ironies or unintended puns...
The first two links are referenced in the next two lines.
The third line and two links are in regard to the heading, and to the sources.
The "Obtuseness Redux" were from Comcast/AP.
But I first went local then tan gent or BaneOr BainOr...
the punchline has to do with they nature of Infowars(the site), a bit more journalistic and fair and balanced than FOX, not that they do not require very careful reads. The four links seem to represent a sort of unsorting and GPS un-crossroads dynamic. And for my part, the first aspect has to do with the irony of any whining about Social Security having an Inspector General division that hunts down fraud, in this age of second amendment fruit salad or T-parties. And for the sake of any intelligence briefs or geeks, "lede" is a journalistic term not a bullet point. The last two links are a good un-cross Rhodes* of the left. Not quite Tin-Foil Hats, not quite Coffee Party, but maybe close enough. (4 hard work?)
* not exactly
** ibid?
(See Labels, but I note here the original four:
DNC Convention, Infowars, Seattle PI, Social Security
(I know, [...] there is a local irony...)
[and global...]***
*** Re-verse asterisk of sorts. Emphasis on not read yet and irony. Heavy on the latter.
[For Rob Sake!]
[M-bed-ed? Actually...]
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Descartes Be4 D...
...hoRsemen.
i.e.
* a tangent for vulnerables minds? (i.e. different ePH words)
~
Wait, I just may have fallen into a legend trap***, ergo Decartes grid-Locke[?]
Anyway, this 3-Minute Philosophy on St. Thomas Aquinas to my listening three times, did not have the -uck word, but might still be awkward to some.
OW
~
ergo: Link 1, Decartes wiki, 2, grammar-monster 3. R-rated 3mPh "Decartes" 4. B.S. on E. G.
*1. PG-rated 3mPh "Aquinas" 2. G-rated YouTube "Mill" 3. :-) -rated YouTube "Mill" 3. P
** inserted link on hold.(The pun was a Wolf in Hitchens form)
e.g.
***
/ ->A Tale of Two Manicheans.
Cultural Threads are Fine.
Know B.S ? ! Evangelii Gaudium !
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
The History of B.S.
[Herstory and Blog Searches* aside.]
[Originally Drafted May 26, 2012]
There is a joke about what the oldest profession is, but I won’t go there. It is more or less about procreation. The B. S. I am talking about is the flip-flop of Simpson-Bowles.[1] Yes, I believe that was its name before it hit the road. It was supposed to be a bi-partisan committee on the debt, but could not come up with any consensus on how it should be addressed, so its full report was submitted more like a Supreme Court decision that was tied.
Recently it seems that its name was changed, to Bowles-Simpson.[2] Was there some reason for that? Could it be to honor the real oldest profession? And I don’t mean the Barter System. If this is too nuanced, maybe it is the joke, to be less about creation, more about pro$e. Either way this is a very economic and political history.
[More Bio-Product.]***
Speaking of PEG’d...(Private Equity Government)[3] or nailed it, Coffee Table This! [4-7] Now that is creationism.
[Now I realize that some boots may be needed for the above, but I was trying to be economic. But the point is that it is always political and it has not been bi-partisan except on the Democratic side. Pun on BP aside.** The irony is that it is about walking a plank. Both want a rising tide, but the Republicans want the people to walk the plank, while politicians take one to the other party boat. Unfortunately this may need deeper boots or Mitt-Flops for the economics, let alone politics. The B.S. may be in this writing, but it is in the links and balanced solutions as well.]
*literally I will present this without links(see footnotes later)
** bi-partisan (now that is slick)
*** oops: sorry for anachronisms
[Originally Drafted May 26, 2012]
There is a joke about what the oldest profession is, but I won’t go there. It is more or less about procreation. The B. S. I am talking about is the flip-flop of Simpson-Bowles.[1] Yes, I believe that was its name before it hit the road. It was supposed to be a bi-partisan committee on the debt, but could not come up with any consensus on how it should be addressed, so its full report was submitted more like a Supreme Court decision that was tied.
Recently it seems that its name was changed, to Bowles-Simpson.[2] Was there some reason for that? Could it be to honor the real oldest profession? And I don’t mean the Barter System. If this is too nuanced, maybe it is the joke, to be less about creation, more about pro$e. Either way this is a very economic and political history.
[More Bio-Product.]***
Speaking of PEG’d...(Private Equity Government)[3] or nailed it, Coffee Table This! [4-7] Now that is creationism.
[Now I realize that some boots may be needed for the above, but I was trying to be economic. But the point is that it is always political and it has not been bi-partisan except on the Democratic side. Pun on BP aside.** The irony is that it is about walking a plank. Both want a rising tide, but the Republicans want the people to walk the plank, while politicians take one to the other party boat. Unfortunately this may need deeper boots or Mitt-Flops for the economics, let alone politics. The B.S. may be in this writing, but it is in the links and balanced solutions as well.]
*literally I will present this without links(see footnotes later)
** bi-partisan (now that is slick)
*** oops: sorry for anachronisms
Monday, August 27, 2012
Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!
Not to step in political correctness but he seems** to be whining about whining, or blaming about blame. But when it comes to change, it should not apply to history.*** You cannot expect 3 years to let you forget* the prior 8 or 30.
* tangent of sorts
** original trigger (tba)
*** combo */**
[Not to fulfill a Geo Me Try but there is something about the try angle and the share 'n angle, not to mention voodoo math. Not to mention Popeyes?]
[Not to mention coffee grounds on the turd blossom as if there was not enough calm post.]
Note: last two links are post post but are germ in8 two[!]
(calm post: Steele/Obama)
* tangent of sorts
** original trigger (tba)
*** combo */**
[Not to fulfill a Geo Me Try but there is something about the try angle and the share 'n angle, not to mention voodoo math. Not to mention Popeyes?]
[Not to mention coffee grounds on the turd blossom as if there was not enough calm post.]
Note: last two links are post post but are germ in8 two[!]
(calm post: Steele/Obama)
Monday, April 04, 2011
Obama Files for 2012!
On my way** to finding the appropriate link or comment I find this by* a fellow Nobel Prize winner, economist Jospeh Stiglitz.
* or rather on
** still on my way
i.e. I may not settle on an appropriate link but Ed Schultz sure covered reaction to the youtube- Ad One.
[And now I will get back to my Coffee. Or rather my original thought.]
[On second thought: I will resist the urge to revisit or resort the original thought in the "Tea Partier" reference. I think that I will preface an earlier comment, "I believe"..."He is the type of leader the country and the world needs."]
* or rather on
** still on my way
i.e. I may not settle on an appropriate link but Ed Schultz sure covered reaction to the youtube- Ad One.
[And now I will get back to my Coffee. Or rather my original thought.]
[On second thought: I will resist the urge to revisit or resort the original thought in the "Tea Partier" reference. I think that I will preface an earlier comment, "I believe"..."He is the type of leader the country and the world needs."]
Monday, August 15, 2011
In order to read...
Sea 1st** Asterisk:
Bachman Perry Overdrive
Iowa Hallelujah Bachman (NPR)
Texas Perry Un-Miracle (Krugman)
LA Times Straw Poll
Graham Perry?
Perry
Jobs Obama Agenda (NYTimes)
Democrats Agenda (McClatchy)
Tables Turn on GOP
Gears Obama to Public
Failure Perry's Job Growth
Center for American Progress
NFRY
Hi Ate Us[!]
* War
not Rall
exactly Dad
Dream
CQ
Obama
Inspiration
** 1st @ asterisk
(pun on straights I was in)
[Speaking of fishing and spinners and red herrings over coffee.]
***
Bachman Perry Overdrive
Iowa Hallelujah Bachman (NPR)
Texas Perry Un-Miracle (Krugman)
LA Times Straw Poll
Graham Perry?
Perry
Jobs Obama Agenda (NYTimes)
Democrats Agenda (McClatchy)
Tables Turn on GOP
Gears Obama to Public
Failure Perry's Job Growth
Center for American Progress
NFRY
Hi Ate Us[!]
* War
not Rall
exactly Dad
Dream
CQ
Obama
Inspiration
** 1st @ asterisk
(pun on straights I was in)
[Speaking of fishing and spinners and red herrings over coffee.]
***
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
The Big Dig
Ron Paul not so much.
Mitt Romney not so much.
Newt Gingrich, deeper.
Re-Group?
NOW, was that what I was talking about? Just teasing. Or "tough surrogate"?
Not having reviewed each of the links, nevertheless here are hints to my G'Ribble.
Under "Mitt Romney" there was a hint that the debate was "on a topic that he should dominate: the economy". Hence the "ledership" of The Big Dig? Investment in infrastructure anyone?
[Then there is the Laffer Curve of Regulation Job Growth. Which is my twist on not just the misuse of the curve, but the avoidance of* regulation. Regulation could be increasing jobs, if they were not avoiding the regulations.]
*the real laugher is in the "willing to report" and the needless "math genious".
[Coffee Party / Organizing Wall Street: De Calf anyone?]
Mitt Romney not so much.
Newt Gingrich, deeper.
Re-Group?
NOW, was that what I was talking about? Just teasing. Or "tough surrogate"?
Not having reviewed each of the links, nevertheless here are hints to my G'Ribble.
Under "Mitt Romney" there was a hint that the debate was "on a topic that he should dominate: the economy". Hence the "ledership" of The Big Dig? Investment in infrastructure anyone?
[Then there is the Laffer Curve of Regulation Job Growth. Which is my twist on not just the misuse of the curve, but the avoidance of* regulation. Regulation could be increasing jobs, if they were not avoiding the regulations.]
*the real laugher is in the "willing to report" and the needless "math genious".
[Coffee Party / Organizing Wall Street: De Calf anyone?]
Friday, November 25, 2011
Post-Turkey Day
RSN[11-25-11][12-1-11 Punchline? Spoiler Alert, do not click on Punchline, before reading full post.]
Krugman, connecting the dots,
Will Durst,
Relative Exceptionalism
Speaking of good dialogue and jokers and will. I met Will Durst at a Democratic function probably in 2004. I managed to catch him at a disadvantage, not intentionally but anything to get a word in. His hands were full or reaching for something in his pockets. Well maybe it was an advantage )IF[*]( you wanted to be prepared for a spit take, as he had an empty coffee cup in his mouth. So I tried out a joke that had come to me. "If corporations are people, where does the death penalty fit in?" So, he was polite or inconvenienced enough to laugh, if I recall correctly, with the cup still in his mouth.
Where do we go from here, the Turkey table? Well... have a good one[!]?
Post Game:
Stieglitz and Krugman new paradigm or paramorphology. Lexical creativity, texts and contexts.
Speaking of Turkeys or even the country[!] {t}=tangent slash criss cross or Relative Exceptionalism, or satire and witch[!]came first, the satire or the jihad? Thanks to Joseph Campbell...
Reader Supported News: The Sharia Turkey
The American Thinker: Happy Halal Thanksgiving
Rob McKenna
Literally in that order. The McKenna ad was found in the American Thinker link, which was in the RSN link, which was from TPMMuckraker. My original intent was to track the satire. Which came first the halal or the peta? Well more correctly in who was sat iring whom? I mean is this really along the lines of the war on Xmas? The FOX in the hen(turkey) house? I mean sat ire[!] at the table! No not IRE but pass the trip to fane.
Actually, I am trying to find something in common*. But I must check the history of halal** and the people for the ethical treatment of animals. The only point in common may be the freedom to choose, another brand, and that may be sharia. Am I carving the irony or just stuffing the turkey?
*Geller and PETA?
** Sharia and hunters: healthy treatment of food
[*] typo original is to IF.
Krugman, connecting the dots,
Will Durst,
Relative Exceptionalism
Speaking of good dialogue and jokers and will. I met Will Durst at a Democratic function probably in 2004. I managed to catch him at a disadvantage, not intentionally but anything to get a word in. His hands were full or reaching for something in his pockets. Well maybe it was an advantage )IF[*]( you wanted to be prepared for a spit take, as he had an empty coffee cup in his mouth. So I tried out a joke that had come to me. "If corporations are people, where does the death penalty fit in?" So, he was polite or inconvenienced enough to laugh, if I recall correctly, with the cup still in his mouth.
Where do we go from here, the Turkey table? Well... have a good one[!]?
Post Game:
Stieglitz and Krugman new paradigm or paramorphology. Lexical creativity, texts and contexts.
Speaking of Turkeys or even the country[!] {t}=tangent slash criss cross or Relative Exceptionalism, or satire and witch[!]came first, the satire or the jihad? Thanks to Joseph Campbell...
Reader Supported News: The Sharia Turkey
The American Thinker: Happy Halal Thanksgiving
Rob McKenna
Literally in that order. The McKenna ad was found in the American Thinker link, which was in the RSN link, which was from TPMMuckraker. My original intent was to track the satire. Which came first the halal or the peta? Well more correctly in who was sat iring whom? I mean is this really along the lines of the war on Xmas? The FOX in the hen(turkey) house? I mean sat ire[!] at the table! No not IRE but pass the trip to fane.
Actually, I am trying to find something in common*. But I must check the history of halal** and the people for the ethical treatment of animals. The only point in common may be the freedom to choose, another brand, and that may be sharia. Am I carving the irony or just stuffing the turkey?
*Geller and PETA?
** Sharia and hunters: healthy treatment of food
[*] typo original is to IF.
Friday, June 08, 2012
It's Obama's Turn
[Keep the Change(scroll down)]
Of course.
Stay the course.
The private* sector is fine
verse US economic turn around.
[Hardball Metaphor. Making the case.***]
* E. G. Private Equity Government
(The nuts and bolts? If Romney cannot understand that the economy has turned around, then what will happen when he turns it around.)
[Ouch ! ]
[Politics Nation ? ]
[Whip Republicans with Reagan and Clinton!]
Thom Hartmann?
Word of tomorrow? Pernicious.**
[Coffee Table This! The Fifth Element.]
6-10-12 Keep the Change!
Yes this is a bumper sticker for Obama! Though the links may be a bumper sticker for Clinton or nuance. Not that I have fully read them yet, I will try to stay the course, not to mention other threads.
6-11-12
Inconvenient Try-Angle !
NOW w/ Corny Copy Ah. "Mind the Gaffe(added 6-13)": "food fight"
Verse us Tony TruthyahKnow.
** anachronism approved: "Perspective" was Norman Goldman's word of the day(Thursday). "Scale" was my suggestion(for Friday), and "pernicious" was my word for Monday.
6-12-12
Curb Your Enthusiasm !
[Duct Tape? Goose Pate!]
[(Middle - Name / N SC ?)]
[ Bubble Up]
6-13-12
Jeb Bush: Walk Back ?
(Hardball)
*** link(s) added
McCain sabotage.
NOW "Picking up the Tab".
6-14-12
Keep the Change!
"Different Visions" NOW!
Past is prologue or (unpassed)Middle - Name.(Scroll-up)
Happy Birthday to us!
The Dickens We Say!
Better to look back than go back!
Preemptive Comment this AM: Obama battles for Fiscal Reality!
Geitner is speaking on Andrea Mitchell Reports.
Andrea Mitchell pulls Geitner's leg on Romney, but he doesn't bite.
Romney wants to get it done. He doesn't want to look back, he wants to Re-Right! If we look back we will see his Re-Write.
Overhang of Obamacare?
It's coming back?
[Not to mention "No New Taxes"! Old taxes will do fine.]
Segue: Presidents Speech to be inserted later.
[Thom Hartmann Couples Counseling/Next President will take credit for "breaking up" better economy.] Talk is cheap?
Of course.
Stay the course.
The private* sector is fine
verse US economic turn around.
[Hardball Metaphor. Making the case.***]
* E. G. Private Equity Government
(The nuts and bolts? If Romney cannot understand that the economy has turned around, then what will happen when he turns it around.)
[Ouch ! ]
[Politics Nation ? ]
[Whip Republicans with Reagan and Clinton!]
Thom Hartmann?
Word of tomorrow? Pernicious.**
[Coffee Table This! The Fifth Element.]
6-10-12 Keep the Change!
Yes this is a bumper sticker for Obama! Though the links may be a bumper sticker for Clinton or nuance. Not that I have fully read them yet, I will try to stay the course, not to mention other threads.
6-11-12
Inconvenient Try-Angle !
NOW w/ Corny Copy Ah. "Mind the Gaffe(added 6-13)": "food fight"
Verse us Tony TruthyahKnow.
** anachronism approved: "Perspective" was Norman Goldman's word of the day(Thursday). "Scale" was my suggestion(for Friday), and "pernicious" was my word for Monday.
6-12-12
Curb Your Enthusiasm !
[Duct Tape? Goose Pate!]
[(Middle - Name / N SC ?)]
[ Bubble Up]
6-13-12
Jeb Bush: Walk Back ?
(Hardball)
*** link(s) added
McCain sabotage.
NOW "Picking up the Tab".
6-14-12
Keep the Change!
"Different Visions" NOW!
Past is prologue or (unpassed)Middle - Name.(Scroll-up)
Happy Birthday to us!
The Dickens We Say!
Better to look back than go back!
Preemptive Comment this AM: Obama battles for Fiscal Reality!
Geitner is speaking on Andrea Mitchell Reports.
Andrea Mitchell pulls Geitner's leg on Romney, but he doesn't bite.
Romney wants to get it done. He doesn't want to look back, he wants to Re-Right! If we look back we will see his Re-Write.
Overhang of Obamacare?
It's coming back?
[Not to mention "No New Taxes"! Old taxes will do fine.]
Segue: Presidents Speech to be inserted later.
[Thom Hartmann Couples Counseling/Next President will take credit for "breaking up" better economy.] Talk is cheap?
Monday, June 03, 2013
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Enough Smirking!
The Sport of Stairs!
Well
... a bit of a Tan gent.
Not [!]
[This is a bit of a Mitt-Flop from a long story short. But you learn something everyday. In my case it is very embarassing, having constucted a home, that yes it is proper to use a stair for a step, as long as you don't trip. Not to mention where I may have gone if I had had more sports. But if it is not too late, don't miss the Stairs link. It covers one of several topics covered at a weekend get together with friends. Taxes that is. Not to mention dressage*. Little did I know that I actually know someone who participates in that sport.]
* well not in the same link, don't forget the sport.
6-25-12 ["a" / "gent" brackets the meta 4, not to mention hard ware or punchline.]
Not my original intent [!][?][?]
[But certainly part of the puzzle, is immigration and citizens united and who cares! Nail? Emigration is as important as immigration, no new taxes does not mean old taxes aren't fine and public option is not a man date or woe man.]
[RM Nix On MR /on M B]
[I of Needle ? ... One legged** coffee table! "Papers Please Ruling." Take 3/4?]
** This originated in a pun on Brewer and the SCOTUS in their two rulings today. Three of the four key ingredients of 1070 were over-turned and the only one standing duplicates federal law. So basically it was overturned and leaves the state with existing law. In the Citizens United/Montana ruling federal law was upheld as well, or rather state law was over-turned as well. To keep this from getting messy, I will simply insert a few Ed Schultz links.
6-26-12 Robert Reich on the same page.
LA Times "reality check".
G P S Cross Rhodes ?
Nav Grid ? / Ambiguous De- sign. (ouch ?)
[Ambiguous Muddle: Andrea Mitchell*** NoPR]
*** Ctrl F "inconvenient" "follow-up" of No Labels BS
Hell***N?
AM AG Definition Gap! Atlantic Pacific / Oceans Don't Protect Us.
[Issa attacks Obama Weakness: C-NewsNation (not looking back @ B*S*)
Hunch Left on the Table. "Court of Public Opinion" Bin/go!
Cause Ma*l Oh Ge!]
[Note: last four uses of asterisks are simply place holders, as in the last case for "u" or "l" or even no place holder. Not to mention ! Spin Cycle ?
Alternate Legs ?]
[Newt Romney Business Man (Green Economy)(Read Levi a thon)?]
[Victory VictiMothy: '68 yada yada]
Well
... a bit of a Tan gent.
Not [!]
[This is a bit of a Mitt-Flop from a long story short. But you learn something everyday. In my case it is very embarassing, having constucted a home, that yes it is proper to use a stair for a step, as long as you don't trip. Not to mention where I may have gone if I had had more sports. But if it is not too late, don't miss the Stairs link. It covers one of several topics covered at a weekend get together with friends. Taxes that is. Not to mention dressage*. Little did I know that I actually know someone who participates in that sport.]
* well not in the same link, don't forget the sport.
6-25-12 ["a" / "gent" brackets the meta 4, not to mention hard ware or punchline.]
Not my original intent [!][?][?]
[But certainly part of the puzzle, is immigration and citizens united and who cares! Nail? Emigration is as important as immigration, no new taxes does not mean old taxes aren't fine and public option is not a man date or woe man.]
[RM Nix On MR /on M B]
[I of Needle ? ... One legged** coffee table! "Papers Please Ruling." Take 3/4?]
** This originated in a pun on Brewer and the SCOTUS in their two rulings today. Three of the four key ingredients of 1070 were over-turned and the only one standing duplicates federal law. So basically it was overturned and leaves the state with existing law. In the Citizens United/Montana ruling federal law was upheld as well, or rather state law was over-turned as well. To keep this from getting messy, I will simply insert a few Ed Schultz links.
6-26-12 Robert Reich on the same page.
LA Times "reality check".
G P S Cross Rhodes ?
Nav Grid ? / Ambiguous De- sign. (ouch ?)
[Ambiguous Muddle: Andrea Mitchell*** NoPR]
*** Ctrl F "inconvenient" "follow-up" of No Labels BS
Hell***N?
AM AG Definition Gap! Atlantic Pacific / Oceans Don't Protect Us.
[Issa attacks Obama Weakness: C-NewsNation (not looking back @ B*S*)
Hunch Left on the Table. "Court of Public Opinion" Bin/go!
Cause Ma*l Oh Ge!]
[Note: last four uses of asterisks are simply place holders, as in the last case for "u" or "l" or even no place holder. Not to mention ! Spin Cycle ?
Alternate Legs ?]
[Newt Romney Business Man (Green Economy)(Read Levi a thon)?]
[Victory VictiMothy: '68 yada yada]
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Nuance
Inserted.
New Aunts.
Just a Position
Ground Zero
[BTW: Massachusetts is the home of Dunkin' Donuts. And I have yet to listen to the complete Position above, but it is kind of funny that Dave Johnson[@40 minutes] follows a Coffee Partier.(around 22 minutes)]
[Not to mention earlier parties.]
[Meanwhile][As well as...]
New Aunts.
Just a Position
Ground Zero
[BTW: Massachusetts is the home of Dunkin' Donuts. And I have yet to listen to the complete Position above, but it is kind of funny that Dave Johnson[@40 minutes] follows a Coffee Partier.(around 22 minutes)]
[Not to mention earlier parties.]
[Meanwhile][As well as...]
Monday, January 03, 2011
Inconvenient
or ignoble* hope.
* original word more bombastic but escapes me
[I will get straight to the point, the bold link is the point, and it will be thrilling if Republicans think they can sustain their gameplan. It is clear that this is an overreach** of analysis and polling to think that Republicans will have a veto-proof House and is admitted in their very next step, a "piecemeal approach".]
** this link is self-reflective not on Krugman's (Voodoo to Dance Video)
No pun intended.
[vis a vis "on the other hand", the fulcrum of the see saw?]
seesaw = pun on perspectivism (Right-Left, Tea Party-No Label, Republican-Obama)Progressive is the fulcrum not the lever, people are the load and counterbalance. In the last contrast; a party with a leader, we may have something. I can't really see No Labels as a movement, let alone a party, but it could have a dialogue at a coffee party.
* original word more bombastic but escapes me
[I will get straight to the point, the bold link is the point, and it will be thrilling if Republicans think they can sustain their gameplan. It is clear that this is an overreach** of analysis and polling to think that Republicans will have a veto-proof House and is admitted in their very next step, a "piecemeal approach".]
** this link is self-reflective not on Krugman's (Voodoo to Dance Video)
No pun intended.
[vis a vis "on the other hand", the fulcrum of the see saw?]
seesaw = pun on perspectivism (Right-Left, Tea Party-No Label, Republican-Obama)Progressive is the fulcrum not the lever, people are the load and counterbalance. In the last contrast; a party with a leader, we may have something. I can't really see No Labels as a movement, let alone a party, but it could have a dialogue at a coffee party.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)